News

Uganda’s $200m electricity subsidy gravy train

Share Bookmark Print Email
Email this article to a friend

Submit Cancel
Rating
Uganda Electricity Transmission Company’s sub-station at Mulago in Kampala. Uganda's power sector loses some $50 million annually due to distribution and transmission losses on its electrical grid. Photo/FILE

Uganda Electricity Transmission Company’s sub-station at Mulago in Kampala. Photo/FILE 

By ANDREW M. MWENDA  (email the author)
Email this article to a friend

Submit Cancel


Posted  Sunday, January 15  2012 at  17:04

On January 11, the Uganda Cabinet agreed to increase electricity tariffs. If it had removed all electricity subsidies, which amount to $202 million annually, prices would have gone up by over 300 per cent on average.

In the end, it increased the tariffs by 40 per cent, suggesting that many rounds of price hikes will come in the near future.

Since 2005, the Uganda government, according to the Vision newspaper has paid out nearly $500 million in such subsidies.

I have been arguing that the government should remove these subsidies altogether. Although the cost of a unit of electricity is Ush1,000 (40 US cents), big and medium scale businesses pay only 18 per cent of this price — Ush180 (7 US cents).

The government tops up the balance with Ush820 (30 US cents) — 82 per cent of the price. Meanwhile, domestic households and small businesses pay Ush385 (15 US cents) per unit of electricity, or 38.5 per cent of the price, and the government pays Ush615 (24 US cents) for them, or 61.5 per cent.

If the government allowed the price everyone pays for electricity to reflect its actual cost, the bill for big businesses would increase by 420 per cent while that of households and small businesses would increase by 260 per cent.

Share This Story
Share

It is very likely that this announcement of a 40 per cent increase alone will cause mass protests in Kampala and other towns; and cause big businesses to begin lobbying for keeping the tariff low.

If the government scrapped the subsidies altogether, the economic returns would save the Uganda economy a huge fiscal drain. However, the resultant political protests are likely to make the government retreat from pushing this sensible policy.

If emotions are cast aside, there are more reasons why the Uganda power subsidy is nonsensical.

Today, only 12 per cent of Ugandans are hooked into the national grid. The other 88 per cent rely on kerosene for lighting and firewood for cooking. So what gives this tiny minority such political weight?

We shall return to this later in this article but first the facts.

Today, the government of Uganda spends Ush560 billion ($202 million) per year subsidising electricity.

This is the fifth largest expenditure in the budget after education, roads, health and defence.

This financial year’s budget is Ush10 trillion ($4.4 billion).

So electricity subsidies consume 5.6 per cent of it. Uganda’s total tax revenue for 2011/12 is expected to be Ush7.0 trillion ($2.8 billion). Therefore, electricity subsidies take 8.0 per cent of that.

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 Next Page »

Add a comment (1 comments so far)

  1. Submitted by anjeru
    Posted January 29, 2012 04:21 PM

    I have no problem with the subsidy. This is how some countries in Asia and even some African countries benefit when manufacturers shift jobs, Egypt is a good example.

.

IN PICTURES: Congo clashes

In a hand-out photograph released by the African Union-United Nations Information Support Team May 2, 2012 outgoing African Union Mission in Somalia (AMISOM) force commander Major General Fred Mugisha (left) prepares to hand over command to his successor, Ugandan Lt. General Andrew Gutti (right) at a ceremony at the mission's headquarters in the Somali capital, Mogadishu. Mugisha had commanded the AU force since early August 2011. Photo/AFP

AMISOM handover

Malawi's late president Bingu wa Mutharika's supporter wears a "Bingu rest in peace" tee-shirt as he stands in front of the Mpumulo wa Bata Mausoleum during his funeral at his Ndata farm residence in the district of Thyolo, southern Malawi, on April 23, 2012. Photo/AFP/Amos Gumulira

Final send off for Mutharika

Sudanese carry an Armed Forces officer as they gather outside the Defence Ministry in the capital Khartoum on April 20, 2012 to celebrate retaking the oil town of Heglig from South Sudanese forces. Border clashes between Sudan and South Sudan escalated last week with waves of air strikes hitting the South, and Juba seizing the north's Heglig oil hub on April 10.  PHOTO/AFP/ASHRAF SHAZLY

Sudan celebrates retaking Heglig